Tagged with media

Two-Fifty Tuesday

I’ve posted on twitter a few times about my love for travel.

I’m getting the travel bug again, bad. More than just a wanton desire for an exotic vacation.

Yesterday I posted where I’d like to travel to for the first time, or go back to. Those places include but not limited to, England, LA, NY, Chicago, Australia, Seattle, Italy, Spain, and Germany.

I really want to go back over seas. It really is incredulous how much I’d love to travel the world, that would be a dream job.

What would you do for a job with your passion for worship design you might ask?

Help the global church find their passion for beauty in worship with media and art and music and to help the communicate effectively internally and externally. Why? because those are my passions.

I catch glimpses of what others are doing in their travels around the world with media in the church and it really begins to stir something in me. Who knows maybe one day this direction will be brought to fruition or maybe it is a dream that will push me and shape me and will blossom into something else entirely. I don’t really know.

I figured this is as good as forum as any to start a dialogue about dreams and passions.

What do you see yourself doing? Where do you see yourself going? Who do you see yourself helping?

What are your passions? dreams? Are they bigger than yourself?

Open Discussion, Go!

Tagged , , , , , ,

I Say Post Modern, You Say, Going to Hell!

Today’s church has gotten stuck, there is a huge battle between the modern church and the post-modern church. The modern church being the answer to the reformation and introduction of the bible to the layman. It’s been there a while, it’s dug its roots in and it’s swung hard right on conservatism. In the past few years a new guy has cropped up, the post-modern church.  His answer is to abandon the modern church, stick it to him and swing as far left as possible while loosely fitting God and all his friends into their web of beliefs.

The biggest problem with the term post modern is every one has their own definition.

post⋅mod⋅ern⋅ism

–noun (sometimes initial capital letter) any of a number of trends or movements in the arts and literature developing in the 1970s in reaction to or rejection of the dogma, principles, or practices of established modernism, esp. a movement in architecture and the decorative arts running counter to the practice and influence of the International Style and encouraging the use of elements from historical vernacular styles and often playful illusion, decoration, and complexity.

Decorative arts, some people see post modernism in the church embracing media and new styles of worship experiences as post modern. Some people think this change is great some people dig their heels in and resist it as much as they can. So what should the church’s response be? Is there an answer in the bible that spells it out for us? Is one side or the other right?

I might get some hell fire and brimstone for this but I don’t think either side has it right!

The church’s goal is edification of the saints and ushering new people into HIS kingdom. It is the great commission, and the great commandment. Love God, Love others, and bring others to love God. Now where does modernity or post-modernity fit into that commission? God didn’t say go out and bring others to me but make sure they follow this one narrow path called the fundamentalist interpretation. On the flip side God didn’t tell you to go out and make sure that people should come to Christ disillusioned to the creed and call of the gospel.

Brian Holt wrote a great blog post evoking some great questions over here. Talking about McLuhan and his media theory. This is widely accepted in and outside of religious circles and there are some aspects we need to sit up and take notice of.

The modern church takes a head in the sand and feet firm on the KJV foundation approach to media and the gospel. If you try to tell them different they spout a pre-conceived canned answer at you that is full of King James prose and holier than thou speak. Music is meant for the message and the message for the music. No toe tapping here. If you talk about media and evoking emotion, the only emotion you should evoke is that of the pastor telling of how Jesus delivered the heathen on the front row from a life of rock and roll.

Those modern churches that do apply media come from the stance that the message should never change regardless of the medium that you choose to use.

The post-modern church adopts McLuhan’s full approach that your medium changes your message. This is what most staunch modernists take issue with, the hugely watered down message. Unfortunately most pastors who swing so far this way came out of the modern church and got burned BAD by it. So naturally their response is to offer an ‘experience’ that is wholly different from what they dealt with as a child.

Most post modern churches have an experiential ‘religion’ where the substance is your reaction to the experience. There is a communal approach to the teaching and Jesus goes from savior king to savior friend. I’m not saying that there is not anything wrong with this view, but I don’t think it can be your only outlook on Christ.

Andy Stanley has a message out there talking about how we put God in a box. Our preconceived notion of how God needs to act, react, be and do. I think this is how both sects of churches have responded. We’ve put God in a box and decided how he should act and react within the confines of a certain worldview.

So how should the body of Christ respond to modernity or post-modernity? That depends on if you want to stick God in a box or not. I stick him in a box every day with my own worldview. Our worldview is just the change in message that the medium has given us. (yes I think McLuhan was correct in his statements that the medium changes the message) I also think there are non-negotiable aspects to the gospel but for every non-negotiable there are 100 negotiable ones.

So who’s going to hell today?

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

an aural report

Tpodcasthe big trend today is podcasting. Go out and download bytes of tutorials, sermons, training, seminars etc. and listen to them for hours on end. iTunes has a great interface for you to go out and collect all kinds of aural candy. There is an entire generation that is being brought up on this self serve bite sized informational media. I am part of this generation. It wasn’t available when i was a kid but I was around as an early adopter of this technology.

Now it’s time for a confession. I can’t handle podcasts. Go ahead, gasp, guffaw, point fingers and harass, I don’t even care. I have tried repeatedly to download interesting podcasts, and podcasts that other people claim to be great. To me it’s background noise and I get absolutely nothing out of them. Give me a written transcript of what that person said, and I will ingest and retain most of what is there. I just caught myself listening to a 20 minute podcast at the request of my boss and I could not repeat one single word of what was said.

Now, this doesn’t mean I can’t consume podcastable media, if there is a visual with the audio then I’m ok. If I’m watching some kind of tutorial then it’s fine. I just cannot be tasked with listening to someone talk while I’m doing something else. The comprehension part of my brain shuts off and I go on working on my task. It’s how I’m able to watch TV, listen to music and work on projects simultaneously.

I’m sure part of my abhorrence for this particular piece of media comes from editing podcasts for endless hours a day. I became so numb to listening to voice over work that I just learned to tune it out and focus on the task at hand, which was micromanaging a wave form and listening for vocal flubs. The other part comes out of growing up in church and listening to non-engaging sermons from bombastic orators and not being able to see over the pew.

Does any one else have this aural flippancy problem?

Tagged , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 633 other followers